Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

AE-BOX (37MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer X3 (220KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) | AE-BOX (37MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | X3 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 220 KH/s | 37 MH/s Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 465W | 360W Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.11 J/KH Best | 9.73 J/MH | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 11.2 kWh | 8.6 kWh Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.67 | $18,698.74 Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$20.09 | $560,962.25 Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 334 x 207 mm | 198 x 95 x 150 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5500 g | 2300 g Best | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
AE-BOX (37MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AE-BOX (37MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 37 MH/s compared to Antminer X3 (220KH/s)'s 220 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.11 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.