Option 1

Option 2

Antminer X3 (220KH/s) and Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X3 | K7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 220 KH/s | 63.5 TH/s Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 465W Best | 3080W | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.11 J/KH Best | 48.50 J/TH | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 11.2 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.67 | $1.21 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$20.09 | $36.44 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $1,727.88 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 47 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 334 x 207 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 5500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to Antminer X3 (220KH/s)'s 220 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.11 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.