Option 1

Option 2

BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | iBeLink | Contextual |
| Model | X9 | BM | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1 MH/s | 6.6 TH/s Best | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2472W | 2400W Best | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2472.00 J/MH | 363.64 J/TH Best | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 59.3 kWh | 57.6 kWh Best | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $23.45 Best | -$3.08 | Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $703.51 Best | -$92.28 | Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 361 x 293 x 219 mm | 205 x 505 x 317 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 17500 g | 9900 g Best | BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) |
BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 6.6 TH/s compared to Antminer X9 (1M) (1MH/s)'s 1 MH/s.
BM-N1 (6.6TH/s) is more energy efficient at 363.64 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.