Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) and Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) | Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | Z11 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 135 KH/s | 33 MH/s Best | Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1418W | 0W Best | Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 10.50 J/KH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 34.0 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $3.45 Best | $1.18 | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $103.44 Best | $35.40 | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 134 x 302 x 242 mm | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5400 g Best | 8550 g | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M10 (33MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 33 MH/s compared to Antminer Z11 (135KH/s)'s 135 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.