Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | Z11 | M50 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 135 KH/s | 128 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1418W Best | 3276W | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 10.50 J/KH Best | 25.59 J/TH | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.0 kWh Best | 78.6 kWh | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $3.45 Best | -$0.57 | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $103.44 Best | -$17.02 | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $637.86 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 134 x 302 x 242 mm | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5400 g | N/A | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to Antminer Z11 (135KH/s)'s 135 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) is more energy efficient at 10.50 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.