Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) | Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Ebang | Contextual |
| Model | Z15 | E9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 840 KH/s | 9 TH/s Best | Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2780W | 1300W Best | Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 3.31 J/KH Best | 144.44 J/TH | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 66.7 kWh | 31.2 kWh Best | Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $30.83 Best | -$1.61 | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $924.80 Best | -$48.36 | Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) |
| Price | $5,593.50 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 6 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 245 x 290 x 132 mm | 126 x 290 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 18000 g | 4700 g Best | Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) |
Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Ebit E9+ (9TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9 TH/s compared to Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s)'s 840 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer Z15 Pro (840KH/s) is more energy efficient at 3.31 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.