Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EPU XC (4.25KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | Z15 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 420 KH/s Best | 4.25 KH/s | Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1510W | 0W Best | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 3.60 J/KH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 36.2 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $13.09 Best | $0.00 | Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $392.57 Best | $0.00 | Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 133 x 290 x 245 mm | 612 x 139 x 360 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9000 g Best | 28400 g | Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) |
Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer Z15 (420KH/s) has a higher hashrate of 420 KH/s compared to EPU XC (4.25KH/s)'s 4.25 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.