Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | Z9 | M33 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 10 KH/s | 242 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 300W Best | 7260W | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 30.00 J/KH | 30.00 J/TH | Tie |
| Daily energy use | 7.2 kWh Best | 174.2 kWh | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.05 Best | -$2.72 | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$1.56 Best | -$81.73 | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | HYDRO | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 482 x 86 x 650 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 27500 g | Contextual |
Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Both miners are tied when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 242 TH/s compared to Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s)'s 10 KH/s.
Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) and Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) have the same listed efficiency.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.