Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) and X16-Q (1.95GH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | Z9 | X16 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 10 KH/s | 1.95 GH/s Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 300W Best | 620W | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 30.00 J/KH Best | 317.95 J/GH | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 7.2 kWh Best | 14.9 kWh | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.05 | $0.17 Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$1.56 | $5.02 Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 360 x 134 x 482 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 10000 g | Contextual |
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.95 GH/s compared to Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s)'s 10 KH/s.
Yes, Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) is more energy efficient at 30.00 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.