Option 1
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s)
Option 2
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)
Balanced match
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) and KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | Z9 | KD | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 42 KH/s | 1.6 TH/s Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 970W | 205W Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 23.10 J/KH Best | 128.13 J/TH | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 23.3 kWh | 4.9 kWh Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.17 Best | -$0.27 | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$5.00 Best | -$7.96 | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 132 x 279 x 226 mm | 150 x 85 x 180 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4700 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) or KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)?
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.6 TH/s compared to Antminer Z9 (42KH/s)'s 42 KH/s.
Is Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) more efficient than KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)?
Yes, Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is more energy efficient at 23.10 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.