Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

EZ100 (12.5KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Avalon | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | Nano | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 6 TH/s Best | 12.5 KH/s | Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 140W | 0W Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 23.33 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 3.4 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.01 | $0.00 Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$0.35 | $0.00 Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Price | $218.65 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 205 x 58 x 115 mm | 213 x 395 x 300 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 860 g Best | 16400 g | Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) |
Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Avalon Nano 3S (6TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 6 TH/s compared to EZ100 (12.5KH/s)'s 12.5 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.