Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | AvalonMiner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | A10 | S9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 37 TH/s Best | 14.5 TH/s | AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2380W | 1350W Best | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 64.32 J/TH Best | 93.10 J/TH | AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 57.1 kWh | 32.4 kWh Best | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.18 | -$1.45 Best | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$65.32 | -$43.62 Best | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 190 x 292 x 190 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 7600 g | 4200 g Best | Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s) |
AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 37 TH/s compared to Antminer S9j (14.5TH/s)'s 14.5 TH/s.
Yes, AvalonMiner 1047 (37TH/s) is more energy efficient at 64.32 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.