Option 1
B1L (60TH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) leads this comparison
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. B1L (60TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | B1L (60TH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | iPollo | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | B1 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 60 TH/s Best | 2.2 TH/s | B1L (60TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3000W | 1600W Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 50.00 J/TH Best | 727.27 J/TH | B1L (60TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 72.0 kWh | 38.4 kWh Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.18 | -$1.85 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$65.40 | -$55.62 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 306 x 290 x 194 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 12700 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
B1L (60TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
B1L (60TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: B1L (60TH/s) or SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
B1L (60TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 60 TH/s compared to SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)'s 2.2 TH/s.
Is B1L (60TH/s) more efficient than SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
Yes, B1L (60TH/s) is more energy efficient at 50.00 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.