Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. B8 (49TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | B8 (49TH/s) | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Bitfury | Baikal | Contextual |
| Model | B | Giant+ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 49 TH/s Best | 2 GH/s | B8 (49TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 6400W | 450W Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 130.61 J/TH Best | 225.00 J/GH | B8 (49TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 153.6 kWh | 10.8 kWh Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$7.73 | -$0.64 Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$231.78 | -$19.14 Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 440 x 650 x 270 mm | 125 x 300 x 140 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 37000 g | 2980 g Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
B8 (49TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
B8 (49TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
B8 (49TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 49 TH/s compared to Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s)'s 2 GH/s.
Yes, B8 (49TH/s) is more energy efficient at 130.61 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.