Option 1
BK-N (20KH/s)
Option 2
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)
BK-N (20KH/s) leads this comparison
BK-N (20KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-N (20KH/s) | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | BK | S5 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 20 KH/s | 1.16 TH/s Best | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 60W Best | 590W | BK-N (20KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 3.00 J/KH Best | 510.82 J/TH | BK-N (20KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 1.4 kWh Best | 14.2 kWh | BK-N (20KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.09 Best | -$0.81 | BK-N (20KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$2.59 Best | -$24.29 | BK-N (20KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 198 x 139 x 125 mm | 137 x 298 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 1800 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
BK-N (20KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: BK-N (20KH/s) or Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)?
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.16 TH/s compared to BK-N (20KH/s)'s 20 KH/s.
Is BK-N (20KH/s) more efficient than Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)?
Yes, BK-N (20KH/s) is more energy efficient at 3.00 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.