Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1

Option 2
A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. BK-N240 (240KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-N240 (240KH/s) | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | BK | A8+ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 240 KH/s | 240 KH/s | Tie |
| Power Consumption | 650W | 480W Best | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.71 J/KH | 2.00 J/KH Best | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 15.6 kWh | 11.5 kWh Best | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.94 | -$0.69 Best | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$28.08 | -$20.73 Best | A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 190 x 320 x 150 mm | 160 x 350 x 250 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 6500 g Best | 7300 g | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
Both miners list the same hashrate for raw output potential.
A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
BK-N240 (240KH/s) and A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) have the same listed hashrate of 240 KH/s.
A8+ CryptoMaster (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.00 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.