Option 1
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Option 2
AL2 Lite (2TH/s)
AL2 Lite (2TH/s) leads this comparison
AL2 Lite (2TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. BK-N240 (240KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-N240 (240KH/s) | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | IceRiver | Contextual |
| Model | BK | AL2 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 240 KH/s | 2 TH/s Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 650W | 500W Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.71 J/KH Best | 250.00 J/TH | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 15.6 kWh | 12.0 kWh Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.94 | -$0.37 Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$28.08 | -$11.10 Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 190 x 320 x 150 mm | 198 x 110 x 201 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 6500 g | 5000 g Best | AL2 Lite (2TH/s) |
Performance
AL2 Lite (2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or AL2 Lite (2TH/s)?
AL2 Lite (2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2 TH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.
Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than AL2 Lite (2TH/s)?
Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.