ASIC miner comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) vs Antminer L9 (16GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

BK-N240 (240KH/s)
VS
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Higher hashrate
L9
Better efficiency
BK
Estimated net daily
L9
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Ask availability
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
240 KH/s
Net daily
-$0.94
Open product page

Option 2

Antminer L9 (16GH/s)

50 available
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Price
$2,847.60
ROI
79 mo
Hashrate
16 GH/s
Net daily
$1.19
Open product page

BK-N240 (240KH/s) leads this comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (16GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

BK
4
metric wins
L9
3
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureBK-N240 (240KH/s)Antminer L9 (16GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Baikal
Antminer
Contextual
Model
BK
L9
Contextual
Hashrate
240 KH/s
16 GH/s
Best
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Power Consumption
650W
Best
3360W
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Efficiency
2.71 J/KH
Best
210.00 J/GH
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Daily energy use
15.6 kWh
Best
80.6 kWh
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$0.94
$1.19
Best
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$28.08
$35.75
Best
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Price
N/A
$2,847.60
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
79 mo
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
190 x 320 x 150 mm
195 x 379 x 290 mm
Contextual
Weight
6500 g
Best
17000 g
BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Performance

Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or Antminer L9 (16GH/s)?

Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 16 GH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.

Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than Antminer L9 (16GH/s)?

Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.