ASIC miner comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) vs Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

BK-N240 (240KH/s)
VS
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Higher hashrate
Ebit E11+
Better efficiency
N/A
Estimated net daily
Ebit E11+
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Ask availability
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
240 KH/s
Net daily
-$0.94
Open product page

Option 2

Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)

Ask availability
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
37 MH/s
Net daily
$1.31
Open product page

Ebit E11+ (37MH/s) leads this comparison

Ebit E11+ (37MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. BK-N240 (240KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

BK
0
metric wins
Ebit E11+
5
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureBK-N240 (240KH/s)Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)Advantage
Brand
Baikal
N/A
Contextual
Model
BK
N/A
Contextual
Hashrate
240 KH/s
37 MH/s
Best
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Power Consumption
650W
0W
Best
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Efficiency
2.71 J/KH
N/A
Contextual
Daily energy use
15.6 kWh
0.0 kWh
Best
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$0.94
$1.31
Best
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$28.08
$39.37
Best
Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
190 x 320 x 150 mm
N/A
Contextual
Weight
6500 g
N/A
Contextual

Performance

Ebit E11+ (37MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)?

Ebit E11+ (37MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 37 MH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.

Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than Ebit E11+ (37MH/s)?

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.