ASIC miner comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) vs EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

BK-N240 (240KH/s)
VS
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Higher hashrate
EZ100
Better efficiency
BK
Estimated net daily
EZ100
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Ask availability
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
240 KH/s
Net daily
-$0.94
Open product page

Option 2

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Ask availability
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Net daily
$1.01
Open product page

BK-N240 (240KH/s) leads this comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

BK
4
metric wins
EZ100
3
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureBK-N240 (240KH/s)EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Baikal
Bombax Miner
Contextual
Model
BK
EZ100
Contextual
Hashrate
240 KH/s
3.8 GH/s
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Power Consumption
650W
Best
760W
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Efficiency
2.71 J/KH
Best
200.00 J/GH
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Daily energy use
15.6 kWh
Best
18.2 kWh
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$0.94
$1.01
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$28.08
$30.17
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
190 x 320 x 150 mm
440 x 427 x 133 mm
Contextual
Weight
6500 g
Best
12700 g
BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Performance

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 3.8 GH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.

Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?

Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.