Option 1
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)
BK-N240 (240KH/s) leads this comparison
BK-N240 (240KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-N240 (240KH/s) | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | BK | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 240 KH/s | 1.1 TH/s Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 650W Best | 900W | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.71 J/KH Best | 818.18 J/TH | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 15.6 kWh Best | 21.6 kWh | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.94 Best | -$0.96 | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$28.08 Best | -$28.68 | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 190 x 320 x 150 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 6500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.1 TH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.
Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.