Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

BK-N240 (240KH/s) and Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | BK-N240 (240KH/s) | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Baikal | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | BK | M50 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 240 KH/s | 128 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 650W Best | 3276W | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 2.71 J/KH Best | 25.59 J/TH | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 15.6 kWh Best | 78.6 kWh | BK-N240 (240KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.94 | -$0.57 Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$28.08 | -$17.02 Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $637.86 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 190 x 320 x 150 mm | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 6500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.
Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.