ASIC miner comparison

BK-N240 (240KH/s) vs X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

BK-N240 (240KH/s)
VS
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Higher hashrate
X16
Better efficiency
BK
Estimated net daily
X16
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Ask availability
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
240 KH/s
Net daily
-$0.94
Open product page

Option 2

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)

Ask availability
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
2.05 GH/s
Net daily
$0.39
Open product page

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) leads this comparison

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. BK-N240 (240KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

BK
2
metric wins
X16
5
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureBK-N240 (240KH/s)X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Baikal
Jasminer
Contextual
Model
BK
X16
Contextual
Hashrate
240 KH/s
2.05 GH/s
Best
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Power Consumption
650W
520W
Best
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Efficiency
2.71 J/KH
Best
253.66 J/GH
BK-N240 (240KH/s)
Daily energy use
15.6 kWh
12.5 kWh
Best
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$0.94
$0.39
Best
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$28.08
$11.74
Best
X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
190 x 320 x 150 mm
445 x 443 x 132 mm
Contextual
Weight
6500 g
Best
10000 g
BK-N240 (240KH/s)

Performance

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

BK-N240 (240KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: BK-N240 (240KH/s) or X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)?

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.05 GH/s compared to BK-N240 (240KH/s)'s 240 KH/s.

Is BK-N240 (240KH/s) more efficient than X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)?

Yes, BK-N240 (240KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.71 J/KH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.