Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S17 (56TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. CK6-SE (17TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | CK6-SE (17TH/s) | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | CK6 | S17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 17 TH/s | 56 TH/s Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3300W | 2520W Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 194.12 J/TH | 45.00 J/TH Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 79.2 kWh | 60.5 kWh Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$3.64 | -$1.86 Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$109.26 | -$55.76 Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 264 x 290 x 200 mm | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 11500 g | 9500 g Best | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 56 TH/s compared to CK6-SE (17TH/s)'s 17 TH/s.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is more energy efficient at 45.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.