Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

A40 (3.3TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. E-AE1M (230MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | E-AE1M (230MH/s) | A40 (3.3TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Miner | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | A40 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 230 MH/s | 3.3 TH/s Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2000W | 1600W Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 8.70 J/MH Best | 484.85 J/TH | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 48.0 kWh | 38.4 kWh Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.58 Best | -$1.73 | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$17.40 Best | -$52.02 | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 443 x 135 x 360 mm | 360 x 290 x 185 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15150 g | 14500 g Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
A40 (3.3TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
E-AE1M (230MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
A40 (3.3TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 3.3 TH/s compared to E-AE1M (230MH/s)'s 230 MH/s.
Yes, E-AE1M (230MH/s) is more energy efficient at 8.70 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.