Option 1
Ebit E11 (30TH/s)
Option 2
X5 (850MH/s)
Balanced match
Ebit E11 (30TH/s) and X5 (850MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Ebit E11 (30TH/s) | X5 (850MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ebang | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | E11 | X5 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 30 TH/s Best | 850 MH/s | Ebit E11 (30TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1950W | 1450W Best | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 65.00 J/TH | 1.71 J/MH Best | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 46.8 kWh | 34.8 kWh Best | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.64 Best | -$1.68 | Ebit E11 (30TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$49.14 Best | -$50.34 | Ebit E11 (30TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 125 x 375 x 190 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 4600 g | Contextual |
Performance
Ebit E11 (30TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X5 (850MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Ebit E11 (30TH/s) or X5 (850MH/s)?
Ebit E11 (30TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 30 TH/s compared to X5 (850MH/s)'s 850 MH/s.
Is Ebit E11 (30TH/s) more efficient than X5 (850MH/s)?
X5 (850MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.71 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.