Option 1

Option 2

Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AL3 (15TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) | AL3 (15TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ebang | IceRiver | Contextual |
| Model | Ebit | AL | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s | 15 TH/s Best | AL3 (15TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1420W Best | 3500W | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 105.19 J/TH Best | 233.33 J/TH | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.1 kWh Best | 84.0 kWh | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.61 Best | -$2.47 | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$48.44 Best | -$74.10 | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 147 x 305 x 161 mm | 370 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5500 g Best | 16000 g | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
AL3 (15TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AL3 (15TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 15 TH/s compared to Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s)'s 13.5 TH/s.
Yes, Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 105.19 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.