Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ebang | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | Ebit | B3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s Best | 780 H/s | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1420W | 360W Best | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Efficiency | 105.19 J/TH | 0.46 J/H Best | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.1 kWh | 8.6 kWh Best | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.62 | -$0.52 Best | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$48.74 | -$15.55 Best | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 147 x 305 x 161 mm | 124 x 313 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 13.5 TH/s compared to Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s)'s 780 H/s.
Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) is more energy efficient at 0.46 J/H.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.