Option 1

Option 2

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) | STU-U1++ (52TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ebang | StrongU | Contextual |
| Model | Ebit | STU | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s | 52 TH/s Best | STU-U1++ (52TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1420W Best | 2200W | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 105.19 J/TH | 42.31 J/TH Best | STU-U1++ (52TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.1 kWh Best | 52.8 kWh | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.61 | $142.71 Best | STU-U1++ (52TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$48.44 | $4,281.36 Best | STU-U1++ (52TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 147 x 305 x 161 mm | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5500 g Best | 8200 g | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) |
STU-U1++ (52TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
STU-U1++ (52TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
STU-U1++ (52TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 52 TH/s compared to Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s)'s 13.5 TH/s.
STU-U1++ (52TH/s) is more energy efficient at 42.31 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.