ASIC miner comparison

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) vs AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
VS
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Higher hashrate
EZ100
Better efficiency
N/A
Estimated net daily
EZ100
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Ask availability
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Net daily
$1.01
Open product page

Option 2

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)

Ask availability
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.25 MH/s
Net daily
$0.00
Open product page

Balanced match

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) and AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.

EZ100
3
metric wins
AL-BOX III
3
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureEZ100-C (3.8GH/s)AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)Advantage
Brand
Bombax Miner
N/A
Contextual
Model
EZ100
N/A
Contextual
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Best
1.25 MH/s
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Power Consumption
760W
0W
Best
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Efficiency
200.00 J/GH
N/A
Contextual
Daily energy use
18.2 kWh
0.0 kWh
Best
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$1.01
Best
$0.00
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$30.17
Best
$0.00
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
440 x 427 x 133 mm
198 x 87 x 150 mm
Contextual
Weight
12700 g
3800 g
Best
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)

Performance

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) or AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)?

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 3.8 GH/s compared to AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)'s 1.25 MH/s.

Is EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) more efficient than AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)?

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.