ASIC miner comparison

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) vs CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
VS
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Higher hashrate
CK
Better efficiency
EZ100
Estimated net daily
EZ100
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Ask availability
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Net daily
$1.01
Open product page

Option 2

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Ask availability
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.05 TH/s
Net daily
-$0.22
Open product page

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) leads this comparison

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

EZ100
3
metric wins
CK
4
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureEZ100-C (3.8GH/s)CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)Advantage
Brand
Bombax Miner
Goldshell
Contextual
Model
EZ100
CK
Contextual
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
1.05 TH/s
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Power Consumption
760W
215W
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Efficiency
200.00 J/GH
Best
204.76 J/TH
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Daily energy use
18.2 kWh
5.2 kWh
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$1.01
Best
-$0.22
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$30.17
Best
-$6.59
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
440 x 427 x 133 mm
175 x 84 x 150 mm
Contextual
Weight
12700 g
2000 g
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Performance

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) or CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)?

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.05 TH/s compared to EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)'s 3.8 GH/s.

Is EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) more efficient than CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)?

Yes, EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) is more energy efficient at 200.00 J/GH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.