ASIC miner comparison

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) vs KS0 (100GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
VS
KS0 (100GH/s)
Higher hashrate
KS0
Better efficiency
KS0
Estimated net daily
EZ100
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Ask availability
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Net daily
$1.01
Open product page

Option 2

KS0 (100GH/s)

Ask availability
KS0 (100GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
100 GH/s
Net daily
-$0.07
Open product page

KS0 (100GH/s) leads this comparison

KS0 (100GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

EZ100
2
metric wins
KS0
5
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureEZ100-C (3.8GH/s)KS0 (100GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Bombax Miner
IceRiver
Contextual
Model
EZ100
KS0
Contextual
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
100 GH/s
Best
KS0 (100GH/s)
Power Consumption
760W
65W
Best
KS0 (100GH/s)
Efficiency
200.00 J/GH
0.65 J/GH
Best
KS0 (100GH/s)
Daily energy use
18.2 kWh
1.6 kWh
Best
KS0 (100GH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$1.01
Best
-$0.07
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$30.17
Best
-$2.21
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
440 x 427 x 133 mm
200 x 74 x 194 mm
Contextual
Weight
12700 g
2500 g
Best
KS0 (100GH/s)

Performance

KS0 (100GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

KS0 (100GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) or KS0 (100GH/s)?

KS0 (100GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 100 GH/s compared to EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)'s 3.8 GH/s.

Is EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) more efficient than KS0 (100GH/s)?

KS0 (100GH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.65 J/GH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.