Option 1
G1 (36H/s)
Option 2
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s)
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) leads this comparison
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. G1 (36H/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | G1 (36H/s) | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | iPollo | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | G1 | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 36 H/s | 12.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2800W | 1576W Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 77.78 J/H Best | 126.08 J/TH | G1 (36H/s) |
| Daily energy use | 67.2 kWh | 37.8 kWh Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $5.90 Best | -$1.88 | G1 (36H/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $176.94 Best | -$56.38 | G1 (36H/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 158 x 355 x 350 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 19000 g | 3800 g Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
Performance
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
G1 (36H/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: G1 (36H/s) or Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s)?
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.5 TH/s compared to G1 (36H/s)'s 36 H/s.
Is G1 (36H/s) more efficient than Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s)?
Yes, G1 (36H/s) is more energy efficient at 77.78 J/H.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.