Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Giant A900 (900H/s) and Antminer L9 (17GH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Giant A900 (900H/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 900 H/s | 17 GH/s Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 3570W | Giant A900 (900H/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 210.00 J/GH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 85.7 kWh | Giant A900 (900H/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $0.85 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $25.48 Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $3,152.70 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 122 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 123 x 300 x 123 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2550 g Best | 17000 g | Giant A900 (900H/s) |
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17 GH/s compared to Giant A900 (900H/s)'s 900 H/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.