Option 1

Option 2

HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (16GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | HS | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 460 GH/s Best | 16 GH/s | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 400W Best | 3360W | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.87 J/GH Best | 210.00 J/GH | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 9.6 kWh Best | 80.6 kWh | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.48 | $1.19 Best | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$14.28 | $35.75 Best | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $2,847.60 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 79 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 84 x 150 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2000 g Best | 17000 g | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 460 GH/s compared to Antminer L9 (16GH/s)'s 16 GH/s.
Yes, HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.87 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.