Option 1

Option 2

HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | HS | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 460 GH/s | 2.2 TH/s Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 400W Best | 1600W | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.87 J/GH Best | 727.27 J/TH | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 9.6 kWh Best | 38.4 kWh | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.48 Best | -$1.62 | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$14.28 Best | -$48.72 | HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 84 x 150 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 2000 g | N/A | Contextual |
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.2 TH/s compared to HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s)'s 460 GH/s.
Yes, HS-BOX 2 (460GH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.87 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.