Option 1

Option 2

HS3-SE (930GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17 (53TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | HS3-SE (930GH/s) | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | HS3 | S17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 930 GH/s | 53 TH/s Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 930W Best | 2385W | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.00 J/GH Best | 45.00 J/TH | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 22.3 kWh Best | 57.2 kWh | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.16 Best | -$1.77 | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$34.78 Best | -$53.23 | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 200 x 290 x 264 mm | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 7300 g Best | 9500 g | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
Antminer S17 (53TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
HS3-SE (930GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (53TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 53 TH/s compared to HS3-SE (930GH/s)'s 930 GH/s.
Yes, HS3-SE (930GH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.00 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.