Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

HS3-SE (930GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. E-AE1M (230MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | HS3-SE (930GH/s) | E-AE1M (230MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | HS3 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 930 GH/s Best | 230 MH/s | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 930W Best | 2000W | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.00 J/GH Best | 8.70 J/MH | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 22.3 kWh Best | 48.0 kWh | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.16 | -$0.58 Best | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$34.78 | -$17.40 Best | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 200 x 290 x 264 mm | 443 x 135 x 360 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 7300 g Best | 15150 g | HS3-SE (930GH/s) |
HS3-SE (930GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
HS3-SE (930GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
HS3-SE (930GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 930 GH/s compared to E-AE1M (230MH/s)'s 230 MH/s.
Yes, HS3-SE (930GH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.00 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.