ASIC miner comparison

HS3-SE (930GH/s) vs EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

HS3-SE (930GH/s)
VS
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Higher hashrate
HS3
Better efficiency
HS3
Estimated net daily
EZ100
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

HS3-SE (930GH/s)

Ask availability
HS3-SE (930GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
930 GH/s
Net daily
-$1.16
Open product page

Option 2

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)

Ask availability
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
3.8 GH/s
Net daily
$1.01
Open product page

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) leads this comparison

EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. HS3-SE (930GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

HS3
3
metric wins
EZ100
4
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureHS3-SE (930GH/s)EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Goldshell
Bombax Miner
Contextual
Model
HS3
EZ100
Contextual
Hashrate
930 GH/s
Best
3.8 GH/s
HS3-SE (930GH/s)
Power Consumption
930W
760W
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Efficiency
1.00 J/GH
Best
200.00 J/GH
HS3-SE (930GH/s)
Daily energy use
22.3 kWh
18.2 kWh
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$1.16
$1.01
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$34.78
$30.17
Best
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
200 x 290 x 264 mm
440 x 427 x 133 mm
Contextual
Weight
7300 g
Best
12700 g
HS3-SE (930GH/s)

Performance

HS3-SE (930GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

HS3-SE (930GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: HS3-SE (930GH/s) or EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?

HS3-SE (930GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 930 GH/s compared to EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)'s 3.8 GH/s.

Is HS3-SE (930GH/s) more efficient than EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?

Yes, HS3-SE (930GH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.00 J/GH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.