Option 1

Option 2
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. L1 Pro (6GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | L1 Pro (6GH/s) | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fluminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | L1 | A9++ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 6 GH/s Best | 140 KH/s | L1 Pro (6GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1400W Best | 1550W | L1 Pro (6GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 233.33 J/GH | 11.07 J/KH Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 33.6 kWh Best | 37.2 kWh | L1 Pro (6GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.30 | $1.89 Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $9.12 | $56.64 Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Price | $1,220.40 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 132 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 140 x 450 x 300 mm | 155 x 360 x 250 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 12800 g | 11000 g Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
L1 Pro (6GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
L1 Pro (6GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 6 GH/s compared to A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)'s 140 KH/s.
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) is more energy efficient at 11.07 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.