Option 1
L1 (5.3GH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)
L1 (5.3GH/s) leads this comparison
L1 (5.3GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | L1 (5.3GH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fluminer | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | L1 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 5.3 GH/s | 2.2 TH/s Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1200W Best | 1600W | L1 (5.3GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 226.42 J/GH Best | 727.27 J/TH | L1 (5.3GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 28.8 kWh Best | 38.4 kWh | L1 (5.3GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.62 Best | -$1.85 | L1 (5.3GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $18.66 Best | -$55.62 | L1 (5.3GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 140 x 450 x 300 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 12800 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
L1 (5.3GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: L1 (5.3GH/s) or SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.2 TH/s compared to L1 (5.3GH/s)'s 5.3 GH/s.
Is L1 (5.3GH/s) more efficient than SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
Yes, L1 (5.3GH/s) is more energy efficient at 226.42 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.