Option 1
L2 (1GH/s)
Option 2
Antminer E3 (180MH/s)
L2 (1GH/s) leads this comparison
L2 (1GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E3 (180MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | L2 (1GH/s) | Antminer E3 (180MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fluminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | L | E3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1 GH/s Best | 180 MH/s | L2 (1GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 230W Best | 800W | L2 (1GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 230.00 J/GH | 4.44 J/MH Best | Antminer E3 (180MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 5.5 kWh Best | 19.2 kWh | L2 (1GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.04 Best | -$1.05 | L2 (1GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $1.16 Best | -$31.56 | L2 (1GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 320 x 160 x 160 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 13000 g | Contextual |
Performance
L2 (1GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer E3 (180MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: L2 (1GH/s) or Antminer E3 (180MH/s)?
L2 (1GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1 GH/s compared to Antminer E3 (180MH/s)'s 180 MH/s.
Is L2 (1GH/s) more efficient than Antminer E3 (180MH/s)?
Antminer E3 (180MH/s) is more energy efficient at 4.44 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.