Option 1
Mars H1 (88GH/s)
Option 2
Antminer T17e (53TH/s)
Balanced match
Mars H1 (88GH/s) and Antminer T17e (53TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Mars H1 (88GH/s) | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Hummer Miner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | H1 | T17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 88 GH/s | 53 TH/s Best | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2800W Best | 2915W | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 31.82 J/GH Best | 55.00 J/TH | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 67.2 kWh Best | 70.0 kWh | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$4.01 | -$2.50 Best | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$120.36 | -$74.93 Best | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 200 x 360 x 350 mm | 175 x 304 x 298 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 21000 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer T17e (53TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Mars H1 (88GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Mars H1 (88GH/s) or Antminer T17e (53TH/s)?
Antminer T17e (53TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 53 TH/s compared to Mars H1 (88GH/s)'s 88 GH/s.
Is Mars H1 (88GH/s) more efficient than Antminer T17e (53TH/s)?
Yes, Mars H1 (88GH/s) is more energy efficient at 31.82 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.