Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

SC-BOX (900GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | SC-BOX (900GH/s) | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | Goldshell | E11 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 900 GH/s Best | 9.5 GH/s | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 200W Best | 2470W | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.22 J/GH Best | 260.00 J/GH | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 4.8 kWh Best | 59.3 kWh | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.07 | $1.06 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$2.04 | $31.90 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 150 x 178 x 84 mm | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2000 g Best | 14200 g | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
SC-BOX (900GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
SC-BOX (900GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
SC-BOX (900GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 900 GH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s)'s 9.5 GH/s.
Yes, SC-BOX (900GH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.22 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.