Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1

Option 2
T2 Turbo (24MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SC1 Slim (550GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | SC1 Slim (550GH/s) | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Obelisk | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | SC1 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 550 GH/s Best | 24 MH/s | SC1 Slim (550GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 450W | 0W Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.82 J/GH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 10.8 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.53 | $0.86 Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$15.84 | $25.80 Best | T2 Turbo (24MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 150 x 400 x 180 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 7500 g | Contextual |
SC1 Slim (550GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
SC1 Slim (550GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 550 GH/s compared to T2 Turbo (24MH/s)'s 24 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.