Option 1

Option 2

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SPx36 (540GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | SPx36 (540GH/s) | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Spondoolies | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | SP | HS3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 540 GH/s | 9 TH/s Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 4400W | 2079W Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 8.15 J/GH Best | 231.00 J/TH | SPx36 (540GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 105.6 kWh | 49.9 kWh Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$4.40 | -$1.10 Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$131.88 | -$33.11 Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 595 x 88 x 434 mm | 331 x 391 x 234 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 19500 g | 6100 g Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
SPx36 (540GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9 TH/s compared to SPx36 (540GH/s)'s 540 GH/s.
Yes, SPx36 (540GH/s) is more energy efficient at 8.15 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.