Option 1
SPx36 (540GH/s)
Option 2
Mars H1 (88GH/s)
Mars H1 (88GH/s) leads this comparison
Mars H1 (88GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SPx36 (540GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | SPx36 (540GH/s) | Mars H1 (88GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Spondoolies | Hummer Miner | Contextual |
| Model | SP | H1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 540 GH/s Best | 88 GH/s | SPx36 (540GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 4400W | 2800W Best | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 8.15 J/GH Best | 31.82 J/GH | SPx36 (540GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 105.6 kWh | 67.2 kWh Best | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$4.40 | -$4.01 Best | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$131.88 | -$120.36 Best | Mars H1 (88GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 595 x 88 x 434 mm | 200 x 360 x 350 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 19500 g Best | 21000 g | SPx36 (540GH/s) |
Performance
SPx36 (540GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
SPx36 (540GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: SPx36 (540GH/s) or Mars H1 (88GH/s)?
SPx36 (540GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 540 GH/s compared to Mars H1 (88GH/s)'s 88 GH/s.
Is SPx36 (540GH/s) more efficient than Mars H1 (88GH/s)?
Yes, SPx36 (540GH/s) is more energy efficient at 8.15 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.