Option 1

Option 2
ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. X7 Miner (262GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) | X7 Miner (262GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | FusionSilicon | Contextual |
| Model | ST | X7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.92 KH/s | 262 GH/s Best | X7 Miner (262GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 61W Best | 1420W | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 4.38 J/KH Best | 5.42 J/GH | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 1.5 kWh Best | 34.1 kWh | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.09 Best | -$1.13 | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$2.64 Best | -$34.04 | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 150 x 84 x 175 mm | 130 x 340 x 198 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2000 g Best | 4800 g | ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) |
X7 Miner (262GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
X7 Miner (262GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 262 GH/s compared to ST-BOX (13.92KH/s)'s 13.92 KH/s.
Yes, ST-BOX (13.92KH/s) is more energy efficient at 4.38 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.