Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Supra 401 (600KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Supra 401 (600KH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 600 KH/s | 2.2 TH/s Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 1600W | Supra 401 (600KH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 727.27 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 38.4 kWh | Supra 401 (600KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $21.39 Best | -$1.62 | Supra 401 (600KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $641.63 Best | -$48.72 | Supra 401 (600KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 6 x 6 x 10 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 400 g | N/A | Contextual |
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.2 TH/s compared to Supra 401 (600KH/s)'s 600 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.