Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1
Option 2

X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) | X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | T2 | X16 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 17.2 TH/s Best | 2.05 GH/s | T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1570W | 520W Best | X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 91.28 J/TH Best | 253.66 J/GH | T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 37.7 kWh | 12.5 kWh Best | X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.70 | $0.39 Best | X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$51.02 | $11.74 Best | X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 150 x 400 x 180 mm | 445 x 443 x 132 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 7500 g Best | 10000 g | T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) |
T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17.2 TH/s compared to X16-Q Pro (2.05GH/s)'s 2.05 GH/s.
Yes, T2 Terminator (17.2TH/s) is more energy efficient at 91.28 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.